| and program combination being used. I have put out a different set of programs that are specifically tailored for anything less than 93 octane fuel. If the cars you have had experience with were running my a-class program on anything less than 93 octane fuel, there's your answer right there. None of what you have stated refutes what I have said - if you have seen other cars run richer A/F mixtures at these relative pressures of 12.3psi, there were other issues with the car that were contributing to this. I dont want to get into a spit fight about any of this, all I was doing was providing information about why we continue to see the things that you say aren't happening (bloated numbers and leaner A/F mixtures). Take a close look at the dyno that was posted with this original thread - it is a JWT-ECU equipped TTZ and it is running leaner than what one would expect to see and producing some questionably high numbers. It has nothing to do with everyone ganging up and proclaiming that Colorado guys can't make any power (although the atmospheric conditions definately aren't helping you guys), but it has everything to do with the results that have been posted over time from the vehicles from that area. I dont understand why you take my advice as some sort of a personal insult to you - honestly I'm pretty tired of the attacks and the contrived messages that "I am up here" and "you are down there" and believing that it puts you into some higher state of awareness of what's going on. There are many things that I am pretty confident you have no understanding of when it comes to how the ECU does its thing. I have tried to elaborate on those things in this post to try and educate anyone who wants to read it. So, where's your beef? Mine certainly isn't with you, so why all the fuss?
[ ashspecz.com ]
[ agpowers@bellsouth.net ] Enthusiasts soon understand each other. --W. Irving.
Are you an enthusiast? If you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.
Albert Einstein
|
